Hsieh & Mertens bag Indian Wells doubles title

Su-Wei Hsieh & Elise Mertens, the No 2 seeds at the BNP Paribas Open, won the title together after beating Veronika Kudermetova & Elena Rybakina, 7-6(1) 6-3, in Saturday’s final at the Indian Wells Tennis Garden.

Norrie faces Basilashvili for Masters title

It has been a surprising ten days at Indian Wells for who would have predicted at the start, that Britain’s Cameron Norrie and Georgia’s Nikoloz Basilashvili would be contesting the final of the BNP Paribas Masters this year?

Azarenka shoots for 3rd Indian Wells title against Badosa

Victoria Azarenka won Indian Wells in 2012 and 2016 and will be shooting for her hat-trick in the BNP Paribas Open trophy match on Sunday, when she will meet debutante finalist Paula Badosa, after both came through highly entertaining semi-final clashes against Jelena...

Two shock results as Tsitsipas and Zverev fall

In what must be the most surprising turnup ever in Masters tennis history, both the two hot favourites for the BNP Pribas Open title have been eliminated from the running in consecutive quarter-final matches

Doubles finalists decided at Indian Wells

The final of the BNP Paribas Open will see Hsieh Su-wei & Elise Mertens pitch their skills against Veronika Kudermetova & Elena Rybakina on Friday.

Badosa upsets Kerber to play Jabeur in Indian Wells semi-finals

The BNP Paribas Open at Indian Wells title is up for grabs as the last 4 women were determined on Thursday, with the highest seed in contention, Angelique Kerber, upset by Paula Badosa, and Ons Jabeur warding off Anett Kontaveit.

Norrie and Dimitrov fill first two S/F places

In what were two very different quarter-final matches Cameron Norrie and Grigor Dimitrov emerged victors to face each other for a place in the Masters 1000 finals of the BNP Paribas Open being currently held out in the Californian desert heat at Indian Wells.

Obituary: Budge Patty (1924-2021)

John Edward ‘Budge’ Patty, a 1977 International Tennis Hall of Fame inductee who was ranked No 1 in the world in 1950, died on 3 October 2021 at the age of 97.

Azarenka to meet Ostapenko in Indian Wells semi-finals

Victoria Azarenka continues to flourish on the hard courts of north America where she reached the semi-finals of the BNP Paribas Open at Indian Wells on Wednesday with a 6-4 6-2 win over Jessica Pegula, while Jelena Ostapenko, her next opponent, battled past Shelby...

Norrie secures QF spot as Medvedev exits

Cameron Norrie continues to reap the rewards of the hard work he put in to improve his fitness during the lockdown as he clocked up his 44th win of the season when he defeated Tommy Paul at Indian Wells to reach the last eight of the BNP Paribas Open and make his...
Tennis News, Tennis Results, Live Tennis Scores & Interviews

Ex-TA Director ‘overstepped the line’

Harold Mitchell was found by the Federal Court to have breached his duties as a Director of Tennis Australia on 3 occasions ahead of the Australian Open, for passing on information to Seven West Media executive Bruce McWilliam, who was described as a ‘colourful character’ by the presiding judge.

Mr Mitchell stepped over the line in his dealings with Mr McWilliam. And his overall conduct had the tendency to undermine the stance and approach of Mr Steven Wood, the CEO. None of this ultimately caused damage to Tennis Australia and none of this was motivated by anything other than Mr Mitchell's perception that it was in the interest of Tennis Australia that the deal with Seven was stitched up sooner and rather than later. Justice Jonathan Beach

Mr Mitchell and former Tennis Australia President Steven Healy were accused by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) of breaching their duties as directors and other offences under the Corporations Act by favouring Seven during the negotiations in 2012 and 2013 for the 5-year rights deal to broadcast the Australian Open.

The corporate watchdog alleged Mr Mitchell and Mr Healy withheld material from the TA board during the negotiations; did not tell the board of the value of the rights; and failed to highlight the interest of other bidders, notably Network 10 and US group IMG.

The trial, which ran over 3 weeks late last year, saw a who’s who of the media world take to the witness box as they were quizzed about the rights negotiations, including Mr McWilliam as well as former Nine Entertainment boss David Gyngell and former Network Ten boss Hamish McLennan.

On Friday Justice Jonathan Beach threw out the bulk of the financial regulator’s allegations against Mr Mitchell, although he may levy a modest fine on him, and also threw out the entire case against Mr Healy.

“In my view, he did so contravene s 180(1) on three occasions … but his contraventions are far narrower in scope than ASIC would have it,” Justice Beach noted, referencing that ‘a director or other officer of a corporation must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise’.

Justice Beach did find Mr Mitchell acted improperly when forwarding internal TA emails to Mr McWilliam and disclosing elements of internal deliberations including that he had ‘stamped on’ TA Chief Executive Steve Wood when he suggested the possibility of awarding the rights to another network.

“Mr Mitchell stepped over the line in his dealings with Mr McWilliam,” Justice Beach said.

“And his overall conduct had the tendency to undermine the stance and approach of Mr Steven Wood, the CEO.

“There were some things that he communicated with Mr McWilliam that he ought not to have done particularly in the latter part of 2012,” Justice Beach added.

“None of this ultimately caused damage to Tennis Australia and none of this was motivated by anything other than Mr Mitchell’s perception that it was in the interest of Tennis Australia that the deal with Seven was stitched up sooner and rather than later.”

“His contraventions are far narrower in scope than ASIC would have it.”

Justice Beach criticised ASIC over how it managed the case, saying: “Much of ASIC’s construction of its evidence displayed confirmatory bias.

“The various cover-up and conspiracy theories that it floated turned out to lack substance.”

The corporate watchdog said it would still push for a banning order despite Justice Beach throwing out most of its case and indicating that he would only likely fine Mr Mitchell.

ASIC has also declined to comment on whether it will appeal the case.

A hearing will be held in August to determine his penalty when Justice Beach said he would hear further arguments from the regulator and Mr Mitchell about the penalties.

Former TA President Steven Healy had all charges against him thrown out

© Tennis Australia

The controversy broke publicly when 3 TA Board members sensationally quit on the eve of the 2016 Australian Open and had been simmering since 2013, but the rancour became clear in 2018 when ASIC issued the proceedings against Mr Mitchell.

ASIC was seeking ‘pecuniary penalties’, or fines, and orders that would see both Mr Mitchell and Mr Healy bundled out from corporate life by being disqualified from managing corporations.

The epic legal battle over a $300 million deal to broadcast one of Australia’s most prestigious sporting events, however, has not ended the corporate career of one of the most powerful men in Australia, who is both a media mogul and a philanthropist.

For a long period, Mr Mitchell was the nation’s most powerful media buyer, running the company that books advertisements into TV, print, radio and online schedules.

The AFR Rich List estimated his wealth at $370 million in 2018, and the noted arts philanthropist was a confidant of Australia’s top media moguls, including the late Kerry Packer, his son James Packer, the Murdoch family and Kerry Stokes, as well as top politicians.

Mr Mitchell is now calling for an investigation into ASIC’s handling of the case saying it cost taxpayers millions of dollars.

In a statement, Mr Mitchell’s publicist Tim Allerton called the decision a ‘humiliating defeat’ for the corporate regulator, with the vast majority, 41 out of 44, of the charges thrown out.

“These allegations were clearly without any basis whatsoever from the outset of its investigation, yet ASIC chose to continue its misguided case,” the statement read.

Mr Allerton continued that ‘ASIC completely misunderstood the TV rights negotiations’ and brought the case ‘relying on allegations from former Tennis Australia board members with an axe to grind’.

Mr Healy said he was still proud of the rights deal he inked for Tennis Australia with Seven.

“I have always been confident of vindication in the case brought by ASIC against me and so am happy today to have received the judgment of the court.”

The Tennis Australia broadcast rights were awarded to Channel Seven for five years in 2013, but there was never a competitive tender process.

Channel Nine finally won the rights to broadcast the Australian Open from 2020 in a new five-year, $300 million deal sealed with Tennis Australia in 2018, ending a 35-year partnership with Channel Seven.



Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.